Week VIII Lab: Finding Scientific Articles on Enchanted Mechanics
Share
We treat the three terms as research questions rather than beliefs:
- Magick → non-mystic enchantment (the wonder that arises from real form and function)
- Magic → the design of illusions (how discrepancy between appearance and process is engineered and measured)
- Occultism → curiosity as method (how deliberate engagement with ignorance drives new knowledge)
Your task is to locate one solid scientific article for each, extract its core data or method, then design a small next step.
Step 1 — Find the papers
Search academic sources (Google Scholar, PubMed, JSTOR, arXiv, etc.) and locate:
- One peer-reviewed paper on non-mystic / secular enchantment, awe, or wonder generated by physical processes or scientific understanding.
- One peer-reviewed paper on the cognitive or perceptual design of illusions (stage magic, visual/auditory discrepancy, misdirection, etc.).
- One peer-reviewed paper on curiosity, the psychology or philosophy of ignorance, or knowledge-seeking as a structured practice.
Save the title, authors, year, and DOI or link for each.
Step 2 — Extract the working piece
For every paper, write only three short lines:
- What was measured or observed
- The key method or experimental design
- The main quantitative or qualitative finding that relates to our term
Keep it tight. No full summaries.
Step 3 — Design the next data
Using the three extracted findings, sketch one minimal follow-up study or data schema that could sit at their intersection.
Specify:
- The new question that links non-mystic enchantment, illusion design, and curiosity
- The primary variables you would collect
- How you would sample them
- What would count as closing (or productively reopening) the gap
Closing
You now hold three real scientific anchors and one original data-design sketch that grows out of them.
That is the lab’s product.
Share any paper titles or your intersection sketch in The Commons if you wish.
